In the United States, all bicycle helmets must comply with the standard created by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). In this standard, bike helmets are only required to by tested above an established test line. Unregulated helmet performance below the test line could pose an increased risk of head injury to riders. This study quantified the impact locations of damaged bike helmets from real-world accidents and tested the most commonly impacted locations under CPSC bike helmet testing protocol. Ninety-five real-world impact locations were quantified. The most common impact locations were side-middle (31.6%), rear boss-rim (13.7%), front boss-rim (9.5%), front boss-middle (9.5%), and rear boss-middle (9.5%). The side-middle, rear boss-rim, and front boss (front boss-middle and front boss-rim regions combined) were used for testing. Two of the most commonly impacted regions were below the test line (front boss-rim and rear boss-rim). Twelve purchased helmet models were tested under CPSC protocol at each location for a total of 36 impacts. An ANOVA test showed that impact location had a strong influence on the variance of peak linear acceleration (PLA) (p = 0.002). A Tukey HSD post hoc test determined that PLA at the side-middle (214.9 ± 20.8g) and front boss (228.0 ± 39.6g) locations were significantly higher than the PLA at the rear boss-rim (191.5 ± 24.2g) location. The highest recorded PLA (318.8g) was at the front boss-rim region. This was the only test that exceeded the 300 g threshold. This study presented a method for quantifying real-world impact locations of damaged bike helmets. Higher variance in helmet performance was found at the regions on or below the test line than at the region above the test line.
© Copyright 2023 Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology. SAGE Publications. Kaikki oikeudet pidätetään. / Kääntänyt https://www.DeepL.com/Translator