Does increasing the severity of penalties assessed in association with the 'zero tolerance for head contact' policy translate to a reduction in head impact rates in youth ice hockey?

Background The risk of concussion is high in Canadian youth ice hockey. Aiming to reduce this burden, in 2011 Hockey Canada implemented a national `zero tolerance for head contact (HC)` policy mandating the penalization of any player-to-player HC. In 2018-20, Hockey Canada further amended this HC-policy including stricter enforcement of severe HCs. Objective To compare HC rates and HC enforcement pre-policy, post-policy, and following policy amendments in elite U15 Canadian youth ice hockey. Design Prospective cohort. Setting A collection of events recorded with a video-camera located at the highest point near centre-ice in public ice hockey arenas in Calgary, Alberta. Participants A convenience sample of 10 AA (elite) U15 (13-14 year old) games pre-policy (2008-09), 8 games post-policy (2013-14), and 10 games following policy amendments (2020-21). Assessment of Risk Factors An analysis of HC-policy implementation and policy amendments across three cohort years. Main Outcome Measurements Using Dartfish video-analysis software; all player contacts and HCs [direct (HC1), indirect (e.g., boards, ice) (HC2)] were tagged using validated criteria. Univariate Poisson regression [clustering by team-game offset by game-length (minutes)] was used to estimate HC1 and HC2 incidence rates (IR) and incidence rate ratios (IRR) between cohorts. Results A total of 11,427 physical contacts were tagged (n2008-09=3896, n2013-14=3183, n2020-21=4348), with 538 contacts including the head (340 HC1,198 HC2) (n2008-09HC1=125, HC2=66; n2013-14HC1=110, HC2=44; n2020-21HC1=105, HC2=88). With additional rule modifications, a 30% reduction in HC1s emerged (IRR2013-2020=0.70, 95%CI:0.51-0.95). Since the HC-policy implementation, HC1s decreased by 24% (IRR2008-2020=0.76, 95%CI:0.58-0.99). The proportion of HC1s penalized was similar across cohorts (P2008-09=14.4%; P2013-14=15.5%; P2020-21=16.2%). Conclusions The HC-policy amendments and increased policy implementation time have led to a decreased rate of HC1s. However, referee enforcement can further boost the HC-policy effectiveness. These findings can help future referee training and potential rule modifications to increase player safety nationally.
© Copyright 2021 British Journal of Sports Medicine. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd of the BMA. Kaikki oikeudet pidätetään.

Aiheet: urheilulääketiede jääkiekko turvallisuus juniori huippu-urheilu vamma Kanada pää harjoittelu kilpailusäännöt ja määräykset
Aihealueet: biologiset ja lääketieteelliset tieteet urheilukilpailut junioriurheilu
Tagging: zero tolerance
DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-IOC.203
Julkaisussa: British Journal of Sports Medicine
Julkaistu: 2021
Vuosikerta: 55
Numero: S1
Sivuja: A86.1-A86
Julkaisutyypit: artikkeli
juliste
Kieli: englanti (kieli)
Taso: kehittynyt