Agreement between the open barbell and tendo linear position transducers for monitoring barbell velocity during resistance exercise

To determine the agreement between the Open Barbell (OB) and Tendo weightlifting analyzer (TWA) for measuring barbell velocity, eleven men (19.4 ± 1.0 y) performed one set of 2-3 repetitions at four sub-maximal percentage loads, [i.e., 30, 50, 70, and 90% one-repetition maximum (1RM)] in the back (BS) and front squat (FS) exercises. During each repetition, peak and mean barbell velocity were recorded by OB and TWA devices, and the average of the 2-3 repetitions was used for analyses. Although the repeated measures analysis of variance revealed significantly (p = 0.005) greater peak and mean velocity scores from OB across all intensities, high intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC2,K = 0.790-0.998), low standard error of measurement (SEM2,K = 0.040-0.119 m·s-1), and coefficients of variation (CV = 2-4%) suggested consistency between devices. Positive (r = 0.491-0.949) Pearson correlations between averages and differences (between devices) in peak velocity, as well as associated Bland-Altman plots, showed greater differences occurred as the velocity increased, particularly at low-moderate intensity loads. OB consistently provides greater barbell velocity scores compared to TWA, and the differences between devices were more apparent as the peak velocity increased with low-to-moderate loads. Strength coaches and athletes may find better agreement between devices if the mean velocity scores are only considered.
© Copyright 2019 Sports. MDPI. Kaikki oikeudet pidätetään.

Aiheet: harjoittelu harjoitus voima, vahvuus biomekaniikka tutkimusmenetelmä nopeus apuväline anturi
Aihealueet: voima ja nopeus urheilu tekniset ja luonnontieteet
Tagging: Hantel
DOI: 10.3390/sports7050125
Julkaisussa: Sports
Julkaistu: 2019
Vuosikerta: 7
Numero: 5
Sivuja: 125
Julkaisutyypit: artikkeli
Kieli: englanti (kieli)
Taso: kehittynyt